Web application and API penetration testing
We identify weaknesses in authentication, access controls, and business workflows through technical testing within the authorized scope.
Useful before a launch or after significant application changes.
Ensoulve / Cybersecurity
Find out where your application is exposed, which findings matter, and how to address them. We conduct penetration tests and architecture reviews, with technical evidence and practical recommendations for your team.
Defined scope. Authorized testing. Documented results.
Services
We work with you to choose the service and depth of review. The proposal sets out what we will assess, what you will receive, and when.
We identify weaknesses in authentication, access controls, and business workflows through technical testing within the authorized scope.
Useful before a launch or after significant application changes.
We analyze trust boundaries, data flows, permissions, and integrations to identify risks in your system’s design.
Useful when making architecture decisions and understanding exposure.
We work with your team to address findings and verify fixes through agreed follow-up testing.
Turns assessment results into verifiable improvements.
Deliverables
An executive summary for decision-makers and reproducible findings for the people implementing the fixes.
Fictional scenario showing the report format. It does not refer to a client or an assessment that has been performed.
Executive summary
An authenticated account can retrieve another account’s invoice because the server does not verify who owns the document.
While signed in as account A, a request is made for an invoice created by account B. In this scenario, the API returns the other account’s document.
GET /api/invoices/invoice-b
Session: account A
Expected: access denied
Observed: 200 OK + account B’s invoiceBilling information is exposed across customers. This example is rated high because of the sensitivity of the documents and because exploitation only requires a valid account and another invoice’s identifier.
The example covers two accounts and one endpoint. It does not establish exposure of other documents or systems.
Check on every request that the resource belongs to the authenticated account. Enforce the control on the server and add cross-account access tests.
Verify that account A can no longer access account B’s invoice and that B retains legitimate access. Verification takes place after the fix is implemented.
Each report is tailored to the agreed scope and the evidence collected during the assessment.
Technical approach
We combine web development, security testing, and architecture experience to assess how your system behaves and what your team needs to strengthen it.
We review roles, permissions, business workflows, and integrations. Each finding is tied to how the application is actually used.
We use the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide as a reference for structuring tests that fit the agreed scope.
View the OWASP WSTGWe explain the technical cause, priority, and proposed changes so your team can plan remediation.
Process
Direct coordination with your team, defined objectives, and results you can review.
We agree on objectives, systems, access, testing windows, and authorization before work begins.
We review the application and agreed controls, validate findings, and document the evidence.
We deliver an executive summary and technical details, then discuss impact, priorities, and fixes with your team.
If you engage us for follow-up, we support remediation and verify fixes through agreed retesting.
Frequently asked questions
Testing is defined around your application and its risks. It may cover authentication, authorization, sessions, APIs, and business logic. The proposal specifies the systems, user roles, and tests included.
We review the number of applications, user roles, integrations, and desired depth of assessment. We then prepare a proposal with scope, deliverables, schedule, and price.
We agree on the environment, required access, testing windows, and an operational contact. Tests that could have an impact require specific authorization and agreed stop criteria.
Before receiving access or sensitive information, we agree on confidentiality, exchange channels, and evidence handling. The initial form only asks for general context.
The proposal states whether follow-up is included or quoted separately. You can implement the recommendations with your team and engage us to verify the fixes later.
Yes. We coordinate the assessment and results review remotely, with points of contact and communication times agreed in advance.
This offer focuses on project-based penetration testing, architecture reviews, and remediation. Continuous monitoring and incident response are outside the scope of this assessment.
Talk about your project
Let us know which application or architecture you would like reviewed. We will follow up to clarify the goals and prepare a proposed scope.
contact@ensoulve.comShare general context only. Access, credentials, and sensitive details are arranged later through an agreed channel.